<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xml:lang="en">
	<title>Desperately Seeking Ethics and Reason</title>
	<subtitle>An autistic Vulcan's quest for sense in a senseless world</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/index.php"/>
        <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/atom.xml"/>
	<updated>2008-12-20T13:55:46-08:00</updated>
	<author>
	<name></name>
	<uri>http://vulcantourist.info/blog/index.php</uri>
	<email></email>
	</author>
	<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason</id>
	<generator uri="http://www.pivotlog.net" version="Pivot - 1.40.0: 'Dreadwind'">Pivot</generator>
	<rights>Copyright (c) 2008, Authors of Desperately Seeking Ethics and Reason</rights>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Why Is Piracy Illegal?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=150" />
		<updated>2008-12-20T13:55:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2008-12-20T13:55:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.150</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">Piracy is no less ethical than the very deliberate efforts of corporate executives and other &amp;quot;entrepreneurs&amp;quot; to manipulate, mis-educate, misinform, and generally disadvantage large groups of people to disproportionately benefit themselves.  The only reason that the one activity (piracy) is illegal and the others aren't is because it's yet another successful example of that manipulation.  The &amp;quot;victors&amp;quot; not only write the histories, they also write the laws, not only including laws that benefit them but also excluding laws that would lessen their advantages over others.

It is this dynamic that drives some people, who observe this ethical favoritism, to consider variations of socialism as an altruistic solution (never mind that socialism can't work as long as entrepreneurs and pirates exist at all). In pure Darwinian terms, though, none of those activities would be &amp;quot;unethical&amp;quot;; any old trickery is fine if it gets the job done (leads to successful reproduction).  That's &amp;quot;competition&amp;quot; in its purest form.  &amp;quot;Cooperation&amp;quot;, however, demands an artificial ethical framework not found in nature. Capitalists, Libertarians, and Socialists disagree on how much cooperation and &amp;quot;fairness&amp;quot; to legislate into a system of ethics, and so we have much infighting and a mish-mash of laws that still winds up benefitting the very wealthy just a bit more than it does the rest of us.</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=150"><![CDATA[
                Piracy is no less ethical than the very deliberate efforts of corporate executives and other &quot;entrepreneurs&quot; to manipulate, mis-educate, misinform, and generally disadvantage large groups of people to disproportionately benefit themselves.  The only reason that the one activity (piracy) is illegal and the others aren&#39;t is because it&#39;s yet another successful example of that manipulation.  The &quot;victors&quot; not only write the histories, they also <strong>write the laws</strong>, not only including laws that benefit them but also excluding laws that would lessen their advantages over others.<br />
<br />
It is this dynamic that drives some people, who observe this ethical favoritism, to consider variations of socialism as an altruistic solution (never mind that socialism can&#39;t work as long as entrepreneurs and pirates exist at all). In pure Darwinian terms, though, none of those activities would be &quot;unethical&quot;; any old trickery is fine if it gets the job done (leads to successful reproduction).  That&#39;s &quot;competition&quot; in its purest form.  &quot;<strong>Cooperation</strong>&quot;, however, demands an artificial ethical framework <strong>not found in nature</strong>. Capitalists, Libertarians, and Socialists disagree on how much cooperation and &quot;fairness&quot; to legislate into a system of ethics, and so we have much infighting and a mish-mash of laws that still winds up benefitting the very wealthy just a bit more than it does the rest of us.
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>VulcanTourist</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Misunderstanding Recession</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=149" />
		<updated>2008-12-02T08:22:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2008-12-02T08:22:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.149</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">Neither average citizens nor even economists really grasp the true cause of a recession; it's certainly not what they have been indoctrinated to believe that it is.  Perhaps some economists actually do know the ugly truth, but are unwilling to admit it publicly. Here's the dirty little Darwinian secret about the origin of
recessions:</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=149"><![CDATA[
                Neither average citizens nor even economists really grasp the true cause of a recession; it&#39;s certainly not what they have been indoctrinated to believe that it is.  Perhaps some economists actually do know the ugly truth, but are unwilling to admit it publicly. Here&#39;s the dirty little Darwinian secret about the origin of
recessions:<br />
<blockquote>
	<p>
	<strong>Recessions are caused by a reduction in the
	ability of the ruling economic class - the wealthy - to concentrate
	wealth at a rate that satisfies their greed.</strong>
	</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
When this happens they turn around and share the <strong>lack of</strong>
wealth, by &quot;trickling down&quot; their displeasure in the form of job
layoffs, etc., taking advantage of the dependencies they created in the
process of becoming wealthy to make the rest of the general population
suffer.
</p>
<p>
The sad thing is that a recession actually signals that
the general citizenry has actually begun to learn how to limit the
tactics of the rich; it&#39;s a win for the average consumer... or at least
it would be if said average consumer didn&#39;t have a job that depended
upon the wealthy, putting them in a position of dependence. (Think we
don&#39;t still have a &quot;barony&quot; of the sort that American forefathers were
supposedly trying to escape? Think again.)
</p>
<p>
The wealthy then
retaliate against this victory by using that trickle-down effect that
Reagan thought was so great to make the general population feel their
pain, too.
</p>
<p>
<strong>A recession is in no way a loss of productivity or general faith in productivity and the &quot;economy&quot;</strong>;
people don&#39;t actually stop being productive. That&#39;s bullshit fed to us
by the wealthy, via mis-educated &quot;economists&quot; who don&#39;t actually have a
clue (because they were very deliberately mis-educated to serve the
interests of the wealthy).
</p>
<p>
The <strong>effect</strong> of a recession is to
teach the general population a lesson, put a (temporary) end to their
little economic victory and return control back to the grabby grubby
greedy little hands of the wealthy. In effect a recession is the
wealthy saying, &quot;If we can&#39;t have our cake and eat it too, then by God
none of the rest of you will, either!&quot;
</p>
<p>
What do you think that
&quot;economic stimulus package&quot; was all about? What is the real purpose of
the &quot;bailout&quot;? That stimulus package was really intended to benefit the
wealthy, not you nor I (I actually refused it), by encouraging people
to once again spend-spend-spend and put profit back in the hands of the
wealthy.
</p>
<p>
Since a recession is actually about loss of control by
the wealthy, why the fuck would we want to give it back to them? Why
don&#39;t we suck it up and finish the job we unknowingly started: kicking
the money-changers out of the temple? Don&#39;t END the recession... DEEPEN
it.</p>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>VulcanTourist</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>&quot;Nobody Has a Right&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=148" />
		<updated>2008-11-11T10:10:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2008-11-11T10:02:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.148</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">Someone wrote elsewhere today:


	
	No, you can thank the drug warriors for our loss of rights. We drug
	users are simply engaging in our right to pursue happiness. Nobody has
	a right to decide what does and doesn't go into my body except for me.
	


 Here's delusional thinking again.</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=148"><![CDATA[
                <p>
Someone wrote elsewhere today:
</p>
<blockquote>
	<p>
	<em>No, you can thank the drug warriors for our loss of rights. We drug
	users are simply engaging in our right to pursue happiness. Nobody has
	a right to decide what does and doesn&#39;t go into my body except for me.</em>
	</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
 Here&#39;s delusional thinking again.</p><div class="commentBody">
<div id="comment_body_25723185">
<p>
Where&#39;d he get this deluded crap, from some Ford auto commercial?
</p>
<p>
As
much as I detest having to waste my time playing parent and telling anyone
what to do, I damned well do have the right - nay, the obligation - to
do just that <strong>if their actions and behavior have an extended social cost</strong>
that they have no intention of paying, if they even acknowledge that cost
at all. In this specific instance, clearly he doesn&#39;t acknowledge that
cost; if he did he&#39;d have to swallow his
self-centeredness and consider a little self-censorship for the sake of
the rest of us.
</p>
<p>
That rampant delusional self-centeredness and
lack of self-censorship and self-control is exactly why we all
(Americans, at least) have to put up with thumping car stereos and so
much more unpleasantness. As a culture this message of &quot;<strong><em>you can do
whatever the hell you feel like doing, whenever you feel like doing it</em></strong>&quot;
has been drummed into children and adults for nearly a century, by both
government and especially by corporate interests. We&#39;re reaping the
dubious rewards of all that indoctrination now. This twit&#39;s attitude
and delusional thinking is just one small consequence.
</p>
<p>
Fuck the We, it&#39;s all about Me, huh?
</p>
</div>
</div>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>VulcanTourist</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>As Good As It Gets?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=147" />
		<updated>2008-11-09T15:47:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2008-11-09T15:47:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.147</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">I know how Melvin Udall feels... or how the un-medicated Melvin felt.


I have this fantasy that there is another pasture somewhere that is
greener - and less populated by mindless, munching, farting bovines - than the one
in which I've chained myself. I was told today by a non-American that &amp;quot;trust me, you live in one of the best managed countries in the world&amp;quot;1.


 I really hope that person is wrong, because I need that fantasy to come true some day.  I need to find my own Carol Connelly, too.</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=147"><![CDATA[
                <p>
I know how Melvin Udall feels... or how the un-medicated Melvin felt.
</p>
<p>
I have this fantasy that there is another pasture somewhere that is
greener - and less populated by mindless, munching, farting bovines - than the one
in which I&#39;ve chained myself. I was told today by a non-American that &quot;trust me, you live in one of the best managed countries in the world&quot;<sup>1</sup>.
</p>
<p>
 I really hope that person is wrong, because I need that fantasy to come true some day.  I need to find my own Carol Connelly, too.</p><blockquote>
	<p>
	<sup>1</sup> My reply to that assertion, by the way:
	</p>
	<p>
	&quot;The fact that this country is &quot;<em>managed</em>&quot; is not, in and of itself, a good thing: it happens to be <strong> <em>managed for the primary benefit of a small minority</em> </strong>.
	The rest of us get &quot;trickle-down&quot; scraps and picked-over bones. I taste
	sour grapes perhaps only because I&#39;m not part of that particular
	minority and never will (and don&#39;t entirely want to) be. I&#39;m well aware
	that NOT &quot;all men are created equal&quot; and that our founders got that wee
	bit seriously wrong - or were just humming what they knew the unequal
	ones wanted to hear - but we should be able to <strong>manage</strong> something more egalitarian than this.  Call me picky.&quot;
	</p>
</blockquote>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>VulcanTourist</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>FTC Says It Wants to Fix Intellectual Property Law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=146" />
		<updated>2008-11-09T09:08:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2008-11-09T09:03:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.146</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">The Federal Trace Commission intends to hold a series of hearings and examine the methods we call &amp;quot;intellectual property&amp;quot; law, with the intention to straighten it all out; they've already held hearings regarding copyright and so-called &amp;quot;digital rights management&amp;quot; (DRM).  That's all fine and good on the face of it, but...


I doubt if the FTC intends to abolish it altogether, and that's the only egalitarian
way to &amp;quot;straighten out&amp;quot; this collection of wealth-concentrating
tactics. Too bad the general population is too unaware, uneducated, and
distracted with their nine-to-fives and other minutia to even know or
care how they're being disadvantaged by it. It's mostly the very same
minority who stands to gain from it, in one fashion or another, which
has any real influence in its existence. That's why IP law exists in
the first place; those who are not egalitarian sought to cement and
further increase their gains, and they succeeded because of general
ignorance (again). We've been stuck with it ever since (centuries), in
one fashion or another and to varying degrees.


We're not yet ready to be the egalitarian Land of the Free that our ancestors alleged.  The People are still incapable of standing up to the minority that seeks to disadvantage them at every turn. The very existence of IP law and DRM and all the rest of it is testament to that unreadiness and incapability.


Messiah Obama can't fix this, either, in large part because he's part of that minority and thinks it's fixed already.</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=146"><![CDATA[
                <p>
The Federal Trace Commission intends to hold a <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/34964"  target="_blank" target='_blank'>series of hearings</a> and examine the methods we call &quot;intellectual property&quot; law, with the intention to straighten it all out; they&#39;ve already held hearings regarding copyright and so-called &quot;digital rights management&quot; (DRM).  That&#39;s all fine and good on the face of it, but...
</p>
<p>
I doubt if the FTC intends to abolish it altogether, and that&#39;s the only <strong>egalitarian</strong>
way to &quot;straighten out&quot; this collection of wealth-concentrating
tactics. Too bad the general population is too unaware, uneducated, and
distracted with their nine-to-fives and other minutia to even know or
care how they&#39;re being disadvantaged by it. It&#39;s mostly the very same
minority who stands to gain from it, in one fashion or another, which
has any real influence in its existence. That&#39;s why IP law exists in
the first place; those who are <strong>not</strong> egalitarian sought to cement and
further increase their gains, and they succeeded because of general
ignorance (again). We&#39;ve been stuck with it ever since (centuries), in
one fashion or another and to varying degrees.
</p>
<p>
We&#39;re not yet ready to be the egalitarian Land of the Free that our ancestors alleged.  The People are still incapable of standing up to the minority that seeks to disadvantage them at every turn. The very existence of IP law and DRM and all the rest of it is testament to that unreadiness and incapability.
</p>
<p>
Messiah Obama can&#39;t fix this, either, in large part because <strong>he&#39;s part of that minority</strong> and thinks it&#39;s fixed already.</p>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>VulcanTourist</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Obama Wants Change, Indeed</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=145" />
		<updated>2008-11-07T11:27:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2008-11-07T11:27:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.145</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">The most substantive change that Obama could make would be the successful promotion and adoption of electoral lotteries to replace our current travesty of democracy (and even republicanism).  He won't do that, however, because it would cut him and his political friends out of the political landscape in the future.  Even if he dared to try, our political Good Old Boys network would shoot him down, just as they did Dennis Kucinich when he tried to propose finally doing the ethical thing and impeaching our current treasonous executives.</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=145"><![CDATA[
                The most substantive change that Obama could make would be the successful promotion and adoption of <strong>electoral lotteries</strong> to replace our current travesty of democracy (and even republicanism).  He won&#39;t do that, however, because it would cut him and his political friends out of the political landscape in the future.  Even if he dared to try, our political Good Old Boys network would shoot him down, just as they did Dennis Kucinich when he tried to propose <em>finally</em> doing the ethical thing and impeaching our current treasonous executives.
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>VulcanTourist</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>A Proposition for California</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=144" />
		<updated>2008-11-06T17:49:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2008-11-06T17:48:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.144</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">Speaking of broken political processes, California's proposition system is the poster child for Machiavellian manipulation.  The apparent passage of Proposition 8 is a spectacular example, since it will require voiding other fundamental sections of the State constitution in order to be valid and enforceable.  The people who crafted the public campaign for it knew this, but also knew that most California residents are completely ignorant of their own state's constitution (among so many other things). 


I think it's time the State revised the proposition system such that passage of any proposition would require a three fourths majority of popular votes.  It's far too easy to find a simple majority of stupid gullible easily manipulated Americans, California residents included.</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=144"><![CDATA[
                <p>
Speaking of broken political processes, California&#39;s proposition system is the poster child for Machiavellian manipulation.  The apparent passage of Proposition 8 is a spectacular example, since it will require voiding other fundamental sections of the State constitution in order to be valid and enforceable.  The people who crafted the public campaign for it knew this, but also knew that most California residents are completely ignorant of their own state&#39;s constitution (among so many other things). 
</p>
<p>
I think it&#39;s time the State revised the proposition system such that <strong>passage of any proposition would require a three fourths majority</strong> of popular votes.  It&#39;s far too easy to find a simple majority of stupid gullible easily manipulated Americans, California residents included.</p>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>VulcanTourist</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>The American Voter's Constant Companion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=143" />
		<updated>2008-11-03T20:10:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2008-11-03T20:10:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.143</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">No matter what cherished candidate gets his chad punched by you tomorrow, there is one constant on which you can count: the certain knowledge that neither/none of them will make any substantive change.  American politics and society as a whole has stagnated; nothing resembling actual sociopolitical evolution has occurred here in a very long time.  Anything resembling actual progress is quickly undone and the process repeated ad nauseum.  The system itself is too broken to allow progress, nor even allow the involvement of people who could enact positive progress and make it stick. America has devolved to something so Darwinian and self-centric that We The People has become an irrelevant historical footnote. 


American politics: rinse, lather, and repeat.</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=143"><![CDATA[
                <p>
No matter what cherished candidate gets his chad punched by you tomorrow, there is one constant on which you can count: the certain knowledge that neither/none of them will make any substantive change.  American politics and society as a whole has stagnated; nothing resembling actual sociopolitical evolution has occurred here in a very long time.  Anything resembling actual progress is quickly undone and the process repeated ad nauseum.  The system itself is too broken to allow progress, nor even allow the involvement of people who could enact positive progress and make it stick. America has devolved to something so Darwinian and self-centric that We The People has become an irrelevant historical footnote. 
</p>
<p>
American politics: rinse, lather, and repeat.</p>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>VulcanTourist</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Electoral Messiah Complexes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=142" />
		<updated>2008-11-04T02:03:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2008-10-29T14:45:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.142</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">It
doesn't matter which one of these two (American) candidates gets your
vote. It's not this or that candidate that is either The Problem or The
Electoral Messiah™. It's the system that is broken, stupid... you can't fix it from within regardless which candidate wins.  Virtually all of the people able to run for office within the current system are part of the problem; well, no, actually they are the problem, collectively.


Collectively the entire American populace has a persistent delusion, this Electoral Messiah Complex™, that no amount of lackluster or outright bad politicians is able to dispel.  I'm sure it will earn me a crucifix for the blasphemy, but I'm reasonably certain that this delusion is comorbid with general religious delusion; they feed one another. 


If
you want to fix this (American) system, it will take another
revolution, and probably not a bloodless one, in order to do it. We'll
have to forcibly kick the money changers and Good Old Boys out of the
temple first, and they won't go quietly. Dennis Kucinich tried to lead
a charge, I think (impeachment), and look how that has turned out.


We're not yet ready to be The Land of the Free (again).</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=142"><![CDATA[
                <div class="commentBody">
<div id="comment_body_25561453">
<p>
It
doesn&#39;t matter which one of these two (American) candidates gets your
vote. It&#39;s not this or that candidate that is either The Problem or The
Electoral Messiah&trade;. It&#39;s the <strong>system</strong> that is broken, stupid... you can&#39;t fix it from within regardless which candidate wins.  Virtually all of the people <strong>able</strong> to run for office within the current system are part of the problem; well, no, actually they <strong>are</strong> the problem, collectively.
</p>
<p>
Collectively the entire American populace has a persistent delusion, this Electoral Messiah Complex&trade;, that no amount of lackluster or outright bad politicians is able to dispel.  I&#39;m sure it will earn me a crucifix for the blasphemy, but I&#39;m reasonably certain that this delusion is comorbid with general religious delusion; they feed one another. 
</p>
<p>
If
you want to fix this (American) system, it will take another
revolution, and probably not a bloodless one, in order to do it. We&#39;ll
have to forcibly kick the money changers and Good Old Boys out of the
temple first, and they won&#39;t go quietly. Dennis Kucinich tried to lead
a charge, I think (impeachment), and look how that has turned out.
</p>
<p>
We&#39;re not yet ready to be The Land of the Free (again).
</p>
</div>
</div>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>VulcanTourist</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Self-Delusion Enacted</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=141" />
		<updated>2008-10-14T23:18:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2008-10-14T23:18:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.141</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">Sometimes I wonder why I continue to watch some television programs; one such program is Law &amp; Order: SVU.  Tonight I was reminded why I still do.  Ellen Burstyn made a guest performance, as Elliot Stabler's bipolar mother, that was a perfect portrayal of a person in complete denial and self-delusion.


I encounter people constantly who are suffering from real-life versions of that complete self-delusion.  Worst of all is when the delusions pervert people's ethics and become a justification for all sorts of ethical trespass, both major and minor.  I wish I could force those people to sit down and watch Burstyn's performance; hopefully holding that mirror up to their own behavior would help them finally divorce themselves from it.  It's my conclusion that the human race will not be able to progress or evolve further until it can leave such bizarre and irrational neurology behind.  I'm accused of being &amp;quot;disordered&amp;quot; myself, and it's true that I seem incapable of making a success of myself in this particular screwed-up illogical world; nevertheless I often feel like the only sane person standing, like Burgess Meredith in an old Twilight Zone episode. They call me crazy merely because I'm too damned sane to fit into the insane world in which I have been unwillingly thrust. 


I'm just a Vulcan tourist who desperately needs to find that return ticket home that was taken from me.</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=141"><![CDATA[
                <p>
Sometimes I wonder why I continue to watch some television programs; one such program is <em>Law &amp; Order: SVU</em>.  Tonight I was reminded why I still do.  Ellen Burstyn made a guest performance, as Elliot Stabler&#39;s bipolar mother, that was a perfect portrayal of a person in complete denial and self-delusion.
</p>
<p>
I encounter people constantly who are suffering from real-life versions of that complete self-delusion.  Worst of all is when the delusions pervert people&#39;s ethics and become a justification for all sorts of ethical trespass, both major and minor.  I wish I could force those people to sit down and watch Burstyn&#39;s performance; hopefully holding that mirror up to their own behavior would help them finally divorce themselves from it.  It&#39;s my conclusion that the human race will not be able to progress or evolve further until it can leave such bizarre and irrational neurology behind.  I&#39;m accused of being &quot;disordered&quot; myself, and it&#39;s true that I seem incapable of making a success of myself in <strong>this</strong> particular screwed-up illogical world; nevertheless I often feel like the only sane person standing, like Burgess Meredith in an old Twilight Zone episode. They call me crazy merely because I&#39;m too damned sane to fit into the insane world in which I have been unwillingly thrust. 
</p>
<p>
I&#39;m just a Vulcan tourist who desperately needs to find that return ticket home that was taken from me.</p>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>VulcanTourist</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Mr. Deity: Almightiness One Day at a Time</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=31" />
		<updated>2007-01-24T01:52:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2007-01-24T01:52:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.31</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">link</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=31"><![CDATA[
                <a href="http://www.mrdeity.com/"  target="_blank" target='_blank'>link</a>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>macraig</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
	<entry>
		<title>Wikipedia: List of Cognitive Biases</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=6" />
		<updated>2007-01-21T01:44:00-08:00</updated>
		<published>2007-01-13T12:18:00-08:00</published>
		<id>tag:,2008:DesperatelySeekingEthicsandReason.6</id>
		<link rel="related" type="text/html" href=""  />
		<summary type="text">link</summary>
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vulcantourist.info/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=6"><![CDATA[
                <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases"  target="_blank" title="List of Cognitive Biases" target='_blank'>link</a><p>
From the Wiki: &quot;<strong>Cognitive bias</strong> is distortion in the way humans perceive reality&quot;.  Of course I have no such bias myself. <img src='http://vulcantourist.info/blog/extensions/emoticons/trillian/e_01.gif' alt=':-)' align='middle'/></p>
		]]></content>
		<author>
			<name>macraig</name>
		</author>
	</entry>
	
	
	
</feed>
